The Baltimore case is not a story about a bad loan product. It’s a story about checks that got skipped. Between 2022 and 2024, a small group of investors allegedly used DSCR loans to borrow against Baltimore rowhomes at three to four times what they had just paid for them, then let the loans default. Two lender lawsuits filed in September 2026 claim more than $24 million in losses. Reporting puts the group’s total DSCR borrowing near $100 million across roughly 700 properties.
Everything below about the people involved comes from court filings and news reporting. These are allegations. None of it has been proven in court.
What happened in Baltimore?
The pattern described in the lawsuits and in local reporting is simple:
- A shell company buys a distressed rowhome for $40,000 to $60,000.
- Days or weeks later, it sells the home to a different LLC tied to an associate, at three to four times the price.
- The buying LLC takes out a DSCR loan backed by an inflated appraisal, allegedly with doctored or fake photos, and with the prior sale left off the application.
- The cash comes out at closing. No renovation happens. Most of the properties never had a permit pulled.
- The loan defaults, and the lender forecloses on a house worth a fraction of what it lent.
One example from the Realtor.com article: a house on North Bond Street bought for $43,000 in May 2022, sold to a related LLC for $310,000 in July 2023, foreclosed, and relisted in August 2026 for $35,000.
The two federal suits:
- Ameritrust Mortgage Corp. filed September 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. It covers about 90 loans and more than $14 million.
- RCN Capital and Commercial Lender LLC filed about a week later, seeking roughly $10 million more tied to 59 properties. That suit names appraisers as co-defendants.
Both allege civil RICO violations. The cost doesn’t stop with the lenders. Tenants have been displaced, and most of the homes sit in majority-Black neighborhoods already hit hard by vacancy. Baltimore City ranked fifth in the country for per-capita foreclosures in ATTOM’s August 2026 data.
Why were DSCR loans the target?
A DSCR loan qualifies on the property’s rent, not the borrower’s personal income. That’s the whole point of the product, and for real investors it works. But two features made it easy to abuse at scale.
Most DSCR loans close in an LLC and don’t report to personal credit. When that borrower applies for the next loan, the new lender usually sees their personal credit and what they own personally, like a primary residence. Properties held in LLCs often never come up. That’s how one group can stack hundreds of loans across lenders who each see only their own file.
DSCR underwriting doesn’t ask the conventional questions. A conventional lender wants to know how many other properties you have financed and how leveraged you are. DSCR, by design, focuses on the property in front of it. For an honest investor with a growing portfolio, that’s a feature. For someone running a scheme, it’s a gap.
Neither feature caused the fraud. Skipped checks did.
What red flags should have stopped these loans?
Any one of these should trigger a hard look. In Baltimore, the reporting suggests many of them showed up together, file after file.
- A value jump with nothing to explain it. A house that sold for $40,000 three months ago does not appraise at $250,000 today unless something real changed. Values don’t triple in a few months. Any reasonable appraiser or underwriter should stop and ask how.
- No permits, no invoices. If the story is “we renovated,” there should be permits, contractor invoices, and before-and-after photos that match. In Baltimore, most of the properties had no permits at all.
- Related parties on both sides. A seller LLC and a buyer LLC with overlapping people, sales days apart, and a big price jump between them.
- A missing sale history. The prior sale is public record. If the application leaves it off, that’s the first question, not the last.
- The same names on file after file. The same appraiser, the same title company, the same broker on dozens of loans in a short window. One appraiser doing a lot of work isn’t a red flag. The same appraiser supporting 300% markups on dozens of houses in a few months is a pattern.
- Photos that don’t match the property. Street-level imagery, listing history, and the county record are free to check.
- A borrower who can’t or won’t produce a full schedule of real estate owned, including everything held in LLCs.
Should DSCR brokers be licensed?
Yes. In many states, brokering a business-purpose loan doesn’t require a mortgage license, because business-purpose lending sits under a long-standing exception to mortgage licensing rules. My view: anyone brokering DSCR loans should, at minimum, be licensed. Where they aren’t, lenders have to be far more discerning about who is sending them files and what those files look like.
A license doesn’t make anyone honest. It does mean a background check, a regulator, a public record on NMLS Consumer Access, and something to lose. Olympus Financial is licensed under NMLS #2469800 in Florida, Colorado, Georgia, Texas, and Illinois, and every loan officer here carries an individual NMLS number you can look up.
What does a clean DSCR loan look like?
If you’re an investor, expect a careful lender to ask for the items below. They aren’t hoops. They’re what separates a real file from a Baltimore file.
| What the lender asks for | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Entity documents: articles of organization, operating agreement, EIN | Confirms who owns and controls the borrowing LLC. |
| A full schedule of real estate owned, including LLC-held properties | Shows total leverage that personal credit won’t. |
| Purchase history and chain of title | Catches related-party flips and missing prior sales. |
| An appraisal with comparable sales that support the value | The value has to be real, not just written down. |
| Proof of improvements on a recent purchase: permits, invoices, photos | Explains any increase in value since you bought. |
| A lease, or the appraiser’s market rent schedule on a vacant unit | Rent is what qualifies the loan. |
| Personal guaranty and a credit report on the guarantor | Ties a real person to the loan. |
| Reserves, shown on bank or asset statements | Shows the property can carry itself through a vacancy. |
If you bought recently and want to borrow against a higher value, bring the paper trail with you. A real renovation backed by permits and invoices is exactly the kind of file lenders want to fund.
One more thing to keep straight: DSCR loans are business-purpose credit for non-owner-occupied rental property. You can’t live in it. Occupying the property more than 14 days a year can take it out of business-purpose lending entirely.
Is DSCR still a good tool?
For a solid investor, a DSCR loan can be a lifesaver. The great majority of people using them are just trying to build a rental portfolio: self-employed owners whose tax returns don’t reflect what they earn, investors who have outgrown conventional limits, people buying a first rental before they own a home. Baltimore doesn’t change any of that.
What it will likely change is how hard lenders look at recent purchases, fast value increases, and borrowers with large LLC portfolios. For a clean file, that’s fine. A few more questions up front cost you a few days. A market full of fraud costs everyone more: tighter guidelines, worse pricing, fewer lenders.
Have a rental you want to finance?
Send us the scenario. We’ll tell you up front what the file needs. See how our DSCR loans work
Sources
- Julie Gerstein, “Baltimore Mortgage Fraud Ring Drove Hundreds of Homes Into Foreclosure, Lawsuits Claim,” Realtor.com, October 20, 2026. https://www.realtor.com/news/real-estate-news/baltimore-dscr-mortgage-fraud-foreclosures-lawsuit-update/
- Flávia Furlan Nunes, “Ameritrust Mortgage sues over $14M Baltimore DSCR fraud scheme,” HousingWire, September 14, 2026. https://www.housingwire.com/articles/ameritrust-mortgage-sues-over-14m-baltimore-dscr-fraud-scheme/
- Jonathan Delozier, “Suspected $100M real estate fraud scheme uncovered in Baltimore,” HousingWire, October 10, 2025 (summarizing The Baltimore Banner’s investigation). https://www.housingwire.com/articles/suspected-100m-real-estate-fraud-scheme-uncovered-in-baltimore/
- American Association of Private Lenders, “Business purpose loans should not be subject to mortgage lender licensing.” https://aaplonline.com/articles/featured/business-purpose-loans-should-not-be-subject-to-mortgage-lender-licensing/